Blog

DEEP RESEARCH · KOSDAQ REVITALIZATION

2025 KOSDAQ Revitalization: Structural Reform and Beneficiary Sectors

A comparison with the 2018 policy and a map of how the KRW 150 trillion National Growth Fund, pension funds, and stricter delisting rules may reshape the market

Written: 2025-12-21 · Asset allocation and policy analysis · Naver Blog

Investment decisions are your responsibility. This material is research, not a recommendation to buy or sell.

0. Bottom line first

The difference in the 2025 KOSDAQ plan is that it is not just a liquidity injection. It attempts to change listing, delisting, pension-fund demand, and strategic-industry capital supply together. The source expects the KRW 150 trillion National Growth Fund and the delisting threshold for companies below KRW 15 billion market cap to widen the gap between quality innovators and marginal companies.

Official fact: The source says KOSDAQ opened in 1996 at 1,000 points and was still around the 900 level as of late December 2025. It also says the 2018 KOSDAQ venture fund offered a 10% income deduction, capped at KRW 3 million per person, and a 30% priority allocation of KOSDAQ IPO shares, attracting about KRW 2.9 trillion in the first three months.

Interpretation: If 2018 was a many-births policy, 2025 is closer to a many-births-and-many-deaths policy: admit good companies and remove weak ones. Investors should focus less on the index as a whole and more on sectors where policy capital meets global demand.

How the 2025 KOSDAQ policy worksDemand expansion and supply cleanup at the same time
EntryCustomized tech listings for AI · energy · space
DemandPension benchmarks · tax incentives · BDC
CapitalKRW 150tn National Growth Fund
ExitMarket cap below KRW 15bn threshold
Innovators re-rate while marginal companies face deeper discounts

1. 2018 policy: achievements and limits

Source image reviewing the 2018 KOSDAQ revitalization policy
Listing

Tesla listing rules

Loss-making companies could list if growth potential was clear. The source mentions diversified criteria such as KRW 50 billion market cap and 20% sales growth.

Demand

KOSDAQ venture fund

Tax deduction and 30% IPO priority allocation created early inflows, but the source notes side effects such as excessive mezzanine issuance and insufficient verification.

Institutions

KRX300

The KOSPI/KOSDAQ 300-stock index tried to induce pension buying, but it remained a recommendation and pension KOSDAQ exposure stayed around 2-3%.

2. 2025 policy: structural force

The source reads the 2025 plan as qualitative upgrading plus structural force. Governance reform includes a Book-in-Book structure that evaluates the KOSDAQ division separately and stronger KOSDAQ market-committee expertise requirements, such as more than 10 years of venture, VC, or technology experience.

  • Customized technology listing: AI, energy such as ESS and renewables, and space receive sector-specific review standards and standing technical advisors.
  • Stricter exits: The source says delisting of companies with market cap below KRW 15 billion begins in earnest from 2026.
  • National Growth Fund: KRW 150 trillion, with KRW 30 trillion per year over five years, targeted at AI, semiconductors, batteries, and other strategic industries.
  • Regional allocation: More than 40% of fund capital is described as going to non-metropolitan regional industries.

3. 2018 versus 2025

Source image comparing 2018 and 2025 KOSDAQ policies
Item2018 policy2025 policyImplication
PhilosophyQuantitative expansionQualitative upgradingFrom indiscriminate listings to verified innovation
ListingTesla rulesCustomized tech listings for AI, space, etc.From broad easing to sector-specific review
Capital supplyKRW 300bn KOSDAQ scale-up fundKRW 150tn National Growth FundThe source describes a 500x increase in scale
TaxKRW 30m deduction capRaised to KRW 50mStronger incentive for wealthy investors
Pension fundsKRX300 recommendationForce through fund-evaluation guidelinesKOSDAQ exposure becomes an evaluation variable
DelistingSubstantive review focusMarket cap below KRW 15bnMarket assessment becomes a survival criterion

4. Market expectations versus actual policy

Market participants expected an extension of the Value-Up program, such as shareholder-return incentives and clearer tax benefits. The source argues the actual policy instead contains both a demand-side surprise and a supply-side shock. The KRW 150 trillion fund is framed as about 30% of the roughly KRW 487 trillion KOSDAQ market capitalization.

Interpretation: In the short term, delisting-risk companies may become more volatile. Over the medium term, removing marginal companies and concentrating demand into quality tech firms could make stock-level dispersion much larger than index movement.

5. Beneficiary sectors and company matrix

The source links U.S. Genesis Mission, new trade order, manufacturing reshoring, and AI data-center power demand with three beneficiary areas: AI/robots, power/energy, and space.

SectorCompanyInvestment pointPolicy/macro link
AI/robotsLunit (328130)Global medical AI leader, listed through technology special listing in 2022AI healthcare and data-center AI-service demand
AI/robotsRainbow Robotics (277810)Collaborative and biped robot platform, Samsung Electronics investmentManufacturing reshoring and Physical AI
Power/energyCheryong Electric (033100)U.S. transformer shortage and rising export exposureGrid modernization and energy infrastructure investment
Power/energySeojin System (178320)ESS parts and telecom equipment cases, global ESS growthData-center backup power and energy efficiency
Power/energyIljin Power (094820)Power-plant maintenance and nuclear equipmentSMR/nuclear ecosystem restoration and AI power demand
SpaceSatrec Initiative (099320)Satellite-system exports and Hanwha Group space synergyCustomized space listings and private space development

6. Conclusion

The 2025 KOSDAQ revitalization plan is more than a market “boom-up”; it is a market-structure reform. Investors should select companies with real earnings and verified technology within AI, semiconductors, robots, power infrastructure, and space, where policy capital is concentrated. Companies with weak market capitalization and weak business substance face higher risk under stricter delisting rules.

Sources