Blog

DEEP RESEARCH · KENCOA AEROSPACE

Kencoa Aerospace: Q3 2025 losses and the aerospace growth option

A combined look at U.S. production, the MRO gap, California Metal, and balance-sheet pressure

Published: 2025-12-14 · Aerospace/defense/MRO/space-materials company analysis · Original Naver Blog post

Investment decisions are your responsibility. This material is research, not a recommendation to buy or sell.

0. Bottom line first

Kencoa's Q3 2025 shows both the growth-stock story and the financial burden. The MRO revenue gap and fixed-cost burden widened losses, but the U.S. ITAR production base and California Metal's aerospace-materials distribution network are rare assets in a New Space cycle.

Official fact: Revenue for the first nine months of 2025 was KRW 56.236363 billion, down 16.0% from KRW 66.967161 billion a year earlier. Operating loss widened to KRW 6.002361 billion from a KRW 1.179022 billion loss, and net loss was KRW 5.759921 billion.

Interpretation: Near-term earnings are poor. But if the MRO project gap recovers, commercial-aircraft supply-chain bottlenecks ease, and SpaceX-related materials demand flows through California Metal, operating leverage can improve sharply. If inventory, CBs, interest expense, and operating cash flow do not improve, the growth option can be constrained by financial risk.

Kencoa cross-border value chainCombining Korean manufacturing with U.S. defense and space supply chains
California MetalTitanium · Inconel · primary processing
Georgia LLCITAR facility · precision machining
Korea HQStructures · MRO · UAM R&D
Kencoa SystemsAutomation equipment · tooling
Vertical integration from materials to machining, assembly, and MRO is the long-term moat

1. Identity and governance

Kencoa Aerospace was founded on April 8, 2013 and listed on KOSDAQ in March 2020. Its headquarters are at 152-44 Oegukgieop-ro, Sanam-myeon, Sacheon, Gyeongsangnam-do. The source says CEO Kenneth Minkyu Lee's U.S. citizenship and network have been important in crossing U.S. defense and aerospace barriers such as ITAR. The largest shareholder is Kepler Co., Ltd. with 27.08%.

EntityLocationOwnershipMain role
Kencoa Aerospace Corp.Sacheon, KoreaHQAircraft structures, Korean military MRO, UAM R&D
Kencoa Group LLCU.S.100%Intermediate holding company for U.S. business
Kencoa Aerospace LLCGeorgia, U.S.100%Precision machining for U.S. military and civil aircraft, ITAR facility
California Metal & Supply Inc.California, U.S.100%Aerospace specialty raw materials distribution and primary processing
Kencoa Investments LLCU.S.100%New 2025 entity for new-business investment and strategic asset acquisition
Kencoa SystemsKorea50%Automation equipment, tooling, potential semiconductor-equipment exposure

2. Industry setting: demand recovery and supply bottlenecks

The source defines the 2025 aerospace market as a bottleneck in which demand is strong but supply cannot keep up. Global air-passenger demand has recovered to pre-pandemic levels, but aircraft deliveries remain below 2018 levels. Boeing 737 MAX quality issues, supply-chain disruption, and Airbus engine shortages are cited as background.

OEM bottleneck

Parts revenue stagnation

The source says aircraft production and machining revenue stalled from KRW 24.2bn a year earlier to KRW 23.4bn.

MRO

Older-aircraft benefit

Airlines unable to receive new aircraft must extend existing aircraft lives, raising heavy maintenance and replacement demand.

New Space

KRW 15.3bn materials revenue

California Metal's nine-month raw-materials segment revenue was KRW 15.3bn, or 27% of total.

3. Segment results and meaning

Segment9M 2025 revenueShareMain content
U.S. aerospace manufacturingKRW 23,463,841k42%U.S. defense and civil-aircraft parts, launch-vehicle parts
Raw-material supplyKRW 15,335,547k27%Aerospace specialty materials, including SpaceX supply
MROKRW 10,783,256k19%PTF conversion, military depot maintenance
Korean aerospace manufacturingKRW 6,653,719k12%Supply to KAI, Hanwha, and domestic customers
TotalKRW 56,236,363k100%Down 16.0% year over year

MRO revenue drove growth through 2024 but dropped sharply in 2025. Nine-month MRO revenue was KRW 10.7 billion, down about 69% from KRW 34.7 billion a year earlier. The source cites PTF project percentage-of-completion recognition, a 2024 large-project base effect, delayed starts for new projects, and possible delays in kits and parts.

California Metal distributes and performs primary processing of aerospace specialty materials such as titanium and Inconel. This is not ordinary steel distribution because AS9100 certification and inclusion on end-user vendor lists such as SpaceX or NASA are required.

4. Capacity and utilization

SiteCapacityUtilizationImplication
Kencoa Aerospace Korea366,232 sets55%Low domestic volume and idle capacity
Kencoa Aerospace LLC U.S.27,300 sets83%High utilization and solid U.S. defense demand
California Metal U.S.23,100 sets72%Stable raw-material processing demand

The Georgia plant's 83% utilization indicates stable defense demand and preparation for a commercial-aircraft production recovery. The Korean Sacheon plant's 55% utilization shows volatility tied to domestic OEM export schedules.

5. Q3 2025 financial forensics

ItemQ3 2025 YTDQ3 2024 YTDYoYNote
RevenueKRW 56,236,363kKRW 66,967,161k-16.0%Large decline in MRO
Cost of salesKRW 52,596,758kKRW 60,376,148k-12.9%Costs fell less than revenue
Gross profitKRW 3,639,605kKRW 6,591,013k-44.8%Sharp profitability deterioration
SG&AKRW 9,641,966kKRW 7,770,036k+24.1%Higher payroll and development expense
Operating loss-KRW 6,002,361k-KRW 1,179,022kwider lossFixed-cost burden increased
Net loss-KRW 5,759,921k-KRW 1,768,217kwider lossIncludes financial expenses
  • Cost of sales ratio was 93.5%, up about 3.4 percentage points from 90.1% a year earlier.
  • SG&A was KRW 9.6 billion, up 24.6% from KRW 7.7 billion, with KRW 3.1 billion of payroll and KRW 1.0 billion of bad-debt expense mentioned.
  • Interest expense alone was KRW 2.2 billion, showing higher external financing costs.
  • Cash and cash equivalents rose to KRW 39.2 billion from KRW 15.9 billion at the start of the year, but this came from borrowings and financing rather than operations.
  • Inventory was KRW 62.4 billion, including KRW 21.9 billion of raw materials and KRW 17.2 billion of work in process, so working capital and impairment risk need monitoring.
  • Operating cash flow was -KRW 3.3 billion, investing cash flow was +KRW 24.5 billion, and financing cash flow was +KRW 2.3 billion.

6. Competitiveness and valuation

CategoryKencoaKAIHanwha AerospaceLIG Nex1
Main fieldCivil aircraft parts, MRO, materialsMilitary aircraft, satellitesEngines, land defenseMissiles, avionics
Market capSmall-capAbout KRW 9.2tnAbout KRW 45.5tnAbout KRW 10.7tn
ProfitabilityLoss in Q3 2025High profitabilityHigh profitabilityHigh profitability
2025E PERN/AAbout 35.7xAbout 28.1xAbout 26.5x
2025E PBRAbout 3.7xAbout 4.8xAbout 5.4xAbout 7.5x

Interpretation: Large defense names receive high multiples from exports and geopolitical demand, while Kencoa is discounted because it is loss-making and has higher civil exposure. But its smaller market cap can make share-price elasticity high when the aerospace theme strengthens.

7. Risks and checkpoints

  • CB overhang: KRW 13.5 billion of current convertible bonds and outstanding hybrid capital create dilution and early-redemption risks.
  • FX: more than 80% of revenue comes from exports, while raw-material imports are also large. The Q3 foreign-exchange loss of KRW 470 million shows the risk is real.
  • MRO uncertainty: investors need to determine whether the 2025 weakness is only a project gap or a decline in order competitiveness.
  • Checkpoints: recovery of PTF conversion volume in Q4 2025 or H1 2026, SpaceX/Starship launch cadence, cooperation with Korean materials companies such as HVM, a return to positive operating cash flow, and inventory efficiency.