Blog

DEEP RESEARCH · SEMICONDUCTORS/EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS

Is a Legacy CAPEX Cycle Really Coming?

A review of the memory investment cycle and equipment/materials basket strategy based on an SK Securities IT equipment/materials report

Written: 2025-09-05 · Semiconductor CAPEX-cycle perspective · Original Naver Blog post

Investment decisions are your own responsibility. This material is research and is not a recommendation to buy or sell.

0. Bottom line first

I still do not know whether a legacy semiconductor CAPEX cycle will really come. The SK Securities report, however, argues that 2025 marks another four-year investment cycle as AI training and inference drive high-performance semiconductor demand, with DRAM +54% and NAND +14%. I am also asking whether it is better to spend time studying this cycle or focus on continuously growing companies and irreplaceable equipment names.

1. My first reaction

I read the report today and, because I do not know the legacy cycle well, I am recording it as the start of studying it. I am not actually sure whether a legacy cycle will come, and part of me thinks simply holding Park Systems or Samsung Electronics may be enough.

Interpretation: I also wonder whether the time would be better spent studying industries and companies that keep growing without a cycle. In this cycle in particular, many factories are being built in the U.S., so I question whether they may use U.S. equipment vendors because maintenance is easier. If U.S. government pressure is also possible, investing around companies with irreplaceable equipment may be better.

2. Report core: a four-year investment cycle

Official fact: The source records an SK Securities IT equipment/materials report by Lee Dong-ju titled “IT Equipment/Materials (Overweight), Run, materials and equipment!” The report says memory investment is surging in 2025, following 2013, 2017, and 2021, because AI training and inference are driving explosive high-performance semiconductor demand. The stated numbers are DRAM +54% and NAND +14%.

Four-year memory CAPEX cycleYears and 2025 numbers mentioned in the report
2013Investment cycle
2017Investment cycle
2021Investment cycle
2025DRAM +54% · NAND +14%
AI training and inference demand is the main explanation for this cycle.

3. Manufacturer investment roadmaps

Official fact: The source says memory manufacturers’ investment roadmaps for this year and next year are becoming more concrete. Samsung Electronics P4 DRAM is 60K/M, split into D1b 15K and D1c 45K. P4 NAND is V9 15K, with V10 orders in 2Q26. SK hynix M15X is scheduled for November completion at 60-70K/M.

Company/lineSource numberMeaning
Samsung Electronics P4 DRAM60K/M, D1b 15K, D1c 45KConcrete DRAM investment
Samsung Electronics P4 NANDV9 15K, V10 orders in 2Q26Equipment order schedule to watch
SK hynix M15XNovember completion, 60-70K/MCheckpoint for the hynix investment cycle

4. U.S. non-memory expansion and possible return to Korea

Official fact: U.S. non-memory expansion plans are also growing. The source notes an additional $100 billion for TSMC’s Arizona fab and more than $40 billion cumulatively for Samsung Electronics’ Taylor fab, with an initial 20K/M. It also mentions the possibility that the U.S. withdrawal of Samsung and SK hynix VEU status could lead investment back to Korea.

TSMC

Arizona

An additional $100 billion investment plan is mentioned.

SAMSUNG

Taylor

More than $40 billion cumulative plan and initial 20K/M are presented.

VEU

Possible return to Korea

The U.S. withdrawal of Samsung and hynix VEU status may connect to a return of domestic investment.

5. How to view materials and equipment in a CAPEX cycle

Official fact: The report says basket buying of materials and equipment is the standard approach in a CAPEX cycle. Historically, equipment stocks formed bottoms at the early stage of Samsung Electronics memory CAPEX expansion, while materials and parts rose with a 3-6 month lag. The conclusion is that sentiment is improving across the materials/equipment chain.

Order of materials/equipment stock reactionThe cycle sequence described in the source report
Early CAPEX riseSamsung memory investment expands
Equipment namesShare-price bottoms form
Materials/partsRise with 3-6 month lag
Whole chainSentiment improves
The report presents equipment moving first, followed by materials and parts.

6. Stock views and attached reports

Official fact: The source says Wonik IPS and Komico remain existing top picks, while Park Systems and Unisem are newly added top picks. It also records EO Technics and TES as recommended names with new momentum in materials and equipment.

StockSource view/target priceLink
Wonik IPSBuy, target price raised to KRW 55,000https://buly.kr/9tBKrgl
TESBuy, target price raised to KRW 33,000https://buly.kr/2UjVfUl
UnisemBuy, target price raised to KRW 11,000https://buly.kr/FhOLEgp
Park SystemsBuy, coverage initiated with KRW 330,000 target pricehttps://buly.kr/1xzEj3k
EO TechnicsBuy, coverage initiated with KRW 270,000 target pricehttps://buly.kr/6XmwEHD

The industry report URL is https://buly.kr/5q7uIul.

7. My checklist

  • Whether the legacy CAPEX cycle actually turns into orders and earnings
  • Whether U.S. fabs prefer U.S. equipment over Korean, Japanese, or European equipment
  • Whether companies with irreplaceable equipment are a better choice than cyclical materials/equipment basket names
  • Whether Park Systems, Samsung Electronics, and the report-mentioned companies are each worth studying

The conclusion remains open. The report’s numbers and cycle logic are worth studying, but I still need to compare whether buying the cycle or buying irreplaceable growth companies is the better choice.

Sources