Blog

DEEP RESEARCH · BOOK REVIEW

[Book Review] How I Made $2,500,000 in the Stock Market

A personal rereading of Nicolas Darvas through the lens of loss control

Written: 2025-06-28 · Investment book review · Naver Blog

Investment decisions are your own responsibility. This material is research and is not a recommendation to buy or sell.

0. Bottom line first

This book is like a textbook or standard reference for me. I have read it about nine times, and I return to it when markets are difficult or confusing. The one point I want to record here is loss control.

1. Why I keep rereading it

Official fact: In the source, this was the book my mentor gave me at our first offline meeting, and I was glad to see it later on a neighbor’s blog. The recorded book details are: author Nicolas Darvas, publisher Kukil Securities Economic Research Institute, release date 2021.01.10.

Book cover and Naver Book information for How I Made $2,500,000 in the Stock Market

Interpretation: The book is worth rereading not because it can be reduced to one trading trick, but because it persuasively explains how an investor’s method changed from the first investment onward.

BOOK

How I Made $2,500,000 in the Stock Market

Short and easy to read, but the evolution of the investing method stays with me.

READING

About nine rereads

A personal reference point when markets are hard or confusing.

CORE

Loss control

The topic that makes me want to reread the full book rather than a summary.

2. The question I want to keep

There are too many important points, but I do not want to make a summary. If I summarize it, I may stop rereading the whole book. Still, if I record one thing, it is loss control.

Can you know a company’s stock price and future with 100% certainty? If it is moving in another direction without you realizing it, do you have an exit plan?

Interpretation: The question is less about forecasting skill and more about whether an exit plan exists. There is no perfect answer in investing, but deciding what to do when I am wrong is closer to survival.