Blog

DEEP RESEARCH · SEMICONDUCTORS / HBM4

HBM4: Samsung vs. SK hynix, and Custom HBM

The sixth-generation HBM transition for AI accelerators: yield, logic base dies, hybrid bonding, and cHBM strategy

Written: 2025-06-27 · Semiconductor memory competition analysis · Original Naver Blog post

Investment decisions are your own responsibility. This material is research and is not a recommendation to buy or sell.

0. Bottom line first

The HBM4 war favors SK hynix in near-term yield stability, while Samsung has greater long-term performance upside if it succeeds with both 1c DRAM and hybrid bonding. The winner is not the first sampler, but the company that stabilizes high-quality, high-yield mass production first.

Official fact: The source says HBM4 features an I/O interface doubled from 1024-bit to 2048-bit and a base die integrating logic process technology, and is expected to command more than a 30% price premium over HBM3E.

1. HBM4 Competitive Landscape

SK hynix

Defensive strategy

Supplied 12-high HBM4 samples to major customers in March 2025 and targets mass production in the second half of 2025, using 1b DRAM and Advanced MR-MUF to reduce transition risk.

Samsung

Challenger strategy

Plans customer sample shipments in July 2025 and takes a high-risk, high-reward path by introducing both 1c DRAM and hybrid bonding.

Micron

Pragmatic strategy

Shipped 12-high 36GB HBM4 samples in June 2025, targets 2026 production, and claims more than 20% power-efficiency improvement over HBM3E.

CompanyDRAM processBase diePackaging / strategyMain risk
SK hynix1bTSMC partnershipAdvanced MR-MUF, yield firstTSMC dependence and next-step speed
Samsung1cIn-house 4nm foundryHybrid bonding, turnkeyCumulative yield across 1c and bonding
Micron1-betaTSMC partnershipPower efficiency and U.S. supply chainCustomer qualification and volume versus leaders

2. Technology Split: 1b Stability vs. 1c Leap

SK hynix and Micron use mature 1b-class DRAM processes already used in HBM3E production, reducing DRAM-side manufacturing risk. Samsung applies next-generation 1c DRAM to HBM4. If it works, Samsung can gain fundamental advantages in performance, power efficiency, and density. The source says early 1c yields were below 30% but have reportedly improved to the 50-70% range in recent tests.

HBM4 technology stackFrom memory component to system-in-package
DRAM node1b vs. 1c
Logic base die4nm and TSMC partnership
BondingMR-MUF vs. hybrid bonding
Customer qualificationRubin and MI400 demand
Cumulative yield across processes determines early competitiveness.

3. Logic Base Die and Foundry Dynamics

The HBM4 base die evolves from simple signal transfer to a logic-integrated layer. The 2048-bit interface, signal integrity, lower latency, and data-path efficiency require it. SK hynix and Micron use TSMC, while Samsung aims to produce logic base dies internally on its 4nm process.

Interpretation: This is where Samsung’s IDM advantage can matter. A turnkey bundle across DRAM, logic design, foundry, packaging, and testing is attractive to customers such as Google, Microsoft, and Meta that want customized HBM. But if yield fails, integration becomes a bottleneck rather than an advantage.

4. Hybrid Bonding as a Double-Edged Sword

The source argues Samsung’s competitiveness depends on simultaneously succeeding with 1c DRAM and hybrid bonding. These technologies can provide performance, density, and power-efficiency advantages if successful, but two unproven, difficult processes can create a cumulative-yield problem in the short term. Samsung’s new technology is both the long-term path to victory and the near-term vulnerability.

5. Rise of Custom HBM

Alongside standard JEDEC HBM, custom HBM, or cHBM, is emerging for customer-specific AI accelerators. The source says customized interfaces and base-die designs maximize PPA, can use up to 25% silicon area freed by shrinking the memory I/O interface or increase the number of HBM stacks by 33%, and can reduce power consumption by up to 70% versus a standard HBM interface.

Samsung

Integrated turnkey

Offers vertical integration across 1c DRAM, in-house 4nm foundry, hybrid bonding, and advanced packaging.

SK hynix

Collaborative ecosystem

Focuses on DRAM and MR-MUF strengths while partnering with TSMC for custom logic base dies.

Micron

Fast follower

Targets hyperscale customers through TSMC cooperation and its Cloud Memory Business Unit.

6. Watch Points

  • Samsung: quarterly 1c DRAM yield maturity, HBM 4nm logic-die yield, SAINT-D hybrid-bonding line yield, and Nvidia qualification timing
  • SK hynix: HBM4 mass-production timing, committed supply volume, HBM4E hybrid-bonding roadmap, and further performance gains through TSMC
  • Micron: customer qualification before 2026 production, power-efficiency differentiation, and U.S. supply-chain premium

HBM4 is entering one of the most technically interesting phases in memory. SK hynix defends its lead with careful engineering; Samsung bets heavily on next-generation technology. The result will come down to manufacturing execution and yield.